Overview
“No justice, no peace.” But what is justice? Is it equality? Freedom? Getting what you deserve?
Core Idea
Justice as Fairness (Rawls): Imagine you are designing a society but you don’t know who you will be in it (rich/poor, smart/dumb, healthy/sick). This is the Veil of Ignorance. You would choose a society where the worst-off person is as well-off as possible (Maximin).
Formal Definition (if applicable)
Distributive Justice: How resources (wealth, opportunity) are shared. Retributive Justice: How punishment is meted out. Restorative Justice: Repairing the harm caused by crime.
Intuition
- Libertarianism (Nozick): Justice is liberty. If I make money fairly, it’s mine. Taxing me to help the poor is theft (forced labor).
- Utilitarianism: Justice is maximizing happiness. If taking $1 from a billionaire gives $100 of happiness to a starving person, do it.
Examples
- Affirmative Action: Is it just to treat people differently to correct past injustice?
- Universal Basic Income: Does everyone deserve a living wage?
- Capital Punishment: Is it ever just to kill a criminal?
Common Misconceptions
- “Fair means equal.” (Not always. Is it fair to give a wheelchair to someone who can walk? No. Equity vs. Equality.)
- “The law is justice.” (Laws can be unjust. Apartheid was legal.)
Related Concepts
- Social Contract: The agreement between citizens and the state.
- Meritocracy: The idea that power/wealth should go to the most able.
- Human Rights: Universal entitlements.
Applications
- Tax Policy: Progressive taxation.
- Criminal Justice Reform: Ending mass incarceration.
- Global Justice: What do rich nations owe poor nations?
Criticism / Limitations
Rawls assumes we are risk-averse. Maybe we would gamble on being rich?
Further Reading
- Rawls, A Theory of Justice
- Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia